#Chasm entangler free#

There is some substance to these political claims, but not much. They have successfully positioned themselves as the party of conservative вЂњprinciple,вЂќ with a mission to roll back the ever encroaching federal government-shutting down agencies and privatizing others, returning power to the states, crushing the New Deal welfare state-while restoring old-fashioned Christian morality to civil society. Beginning with the Nixon campaign of 1968, they have carried out an elaborate plan of action to muster the вЂњsilent majorityвЂќ and bring what was a splintered and broken party to power. The Republicans, on the other hand, have, since the days of Barry Goldwater, articulated a clear ideology.

Currently sheвЂ™s known as the mother of documentary filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi, who traveled with George Bush during his campaign, and whose filmmaking, among other things, apparently spurred the two families to meet for lunch. Pelosi hails from a Baltimore Democratic political family and says she traces her roots to FDR. As of late, Pelosi is best known for her role as senior House Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, where with the rest of this deadbeat crew she ignored or covered up the U.S. Gephardt is not quitting as a failure, but to prepare for a presidential run in 2004. Now, some say, there may be a real shakeup in the party in the wake of the midterm defeat, the failed Dick Gephardt stepping down as minority leader, and the Democrats turning to new leadership in the form of California Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. It is what William Greider calls a вЂњmanagerialвЂќ party, exemplified by the technocratic fussbudgets in the Democratic Leadership Council. TodayвЂ™s Democratic Party is less a party than an entrenched Washington apparatus, which operates as a sort of simulacrum of itself, bellowing the names of past icons, while it carries on the business of responding to the interests of one lobby group or another.

He managed to leave his greatest mark on history by giving the Republicans an opportunity to impeach him because of an ill-timed blowjob. Clinton put the final nail in the New DealвЂ™s coffin-embracing welfare вЂњreform,вЂќ screwing up and then abandoning health care, even letting it be known that his administration would look kindly on experiments to reform Social Security by handing partial control to Wall Street brokerages. Charting new ground with an allegedly centrist support base, Clinton tried to outfox conservatives by adopting halfhearted versions of their own plans. Flailing wildly, Carter tried to beat the right by co-opting its economic plan, doing such things as embracing deregulation of the energy industry and other businesses. That, in turn, went hand in hand with Ronald ReaganвЂ™s march to power. His decision to abandon the Panama Canal helped result in the founding of the New Right. The Democrats havenвЂ™t had a shred of original ideology since the New Deal, or a spark of fire in their bellies since the nominally liberal momentum of the Kennedy-Johnson years ran aground on the partyвЂ™s cowardly refusal to oppose the Vietnam War.ДЄnd it was Jimmy Carter who provided the spark that fired up the right wing.

In fact, this party has been disintegrating since it nominated Hubert Humphrey in the bloody streets of Chicago in 1968.

From the punditsвЂ™ portentous tones, youвЂ™d never guess that they were beating a horse thatвЂ™s been dead for more than 30 years. The Democrats lost, they say, because they no longer stand for anything. Since last weekвЂ™s election, liberals have been melodramatically wringing their hands, while the pundits have rushed to expound upon the deeper meaning of the Republican sweep.

#Chasm entangler free#

You Are Not Free to Move About the Cabin.